What Counts As Domestic Violence In Family Court
Domestic violence is broader than bruises or police reports. Family courts increasingly recognize a spectrum of behaviors, including coercive control. That can involve isolating a partner from friends and family, monitoring phones or location data, controlling money, making immigration or employment threats, damaging property, abusing pets, or using intimidation and humiliation to dominate daily life. Verbal harassment, stalking, and technology-based abuse can also qualify. Even without a recent physical assault, a sustained pattern of fear and control can be enough for a judge to treat the situation as abuse and build safety protections into a parenting plan.
How Judges Evaluate DV In Custody Cases
Judges begin with safety and then consider stability, each parent’s caregiving history, the child’s needs and routines, and the practical details of exchanges and communication. Evidence is about the pattern, not just a single event. Helpful materials often include protection orders (temporary or final), police or medical records, photos of injuries or damaged property, texts and emails, app screenshots, school or therapist notes reflecting the child’s experience, and statements from neighbors, relatives, caregivers, or teachers who have seen the behavior or its effects. Courts balance this information with the child’s need for consistency—school schedules, childcare arrangements, health appointments, and familiar routines all matter.
🧭 How Courts Translate DV Evidence into a Parenting Plan
Scenario: Over several months, one parent sends threatening texts, controls the family’s finances, and shows up unannounced at exchanges. At the hearing, the judge prioritizes safety and stability. The court limits contact to a co-parenting app, orders supervised exchanges at a visitation center, initiates daytime visits only, and grants the other parent temporary sole decision-making—while establishing clear steps for any future changes.
Risk / Pattern |
Common Court Tool |
What Helps Your Case |
Coercive control, threats, relentless messages |
App-only communication; no direct contact |
Dated screenshots/logs showing the pattern + impact on the child |
Volatile or unsafe exchanges |
Supervised exchanges or police-station hand-offs |
Specific, child-friendly locations/times that match school routines |
Recent incident; substance concerns |
Daytime-only visits; testing/treatment as ordered |
Medical/police notes, visitation reports, and a realistic step-up plan |
Examples for illustration; actual orders vary by state and facts.
Decision-Making Versus Parenting Time
Legal custody (decision-making) and physical custody/parenting time are separate questions. In DV cases, it’s common for courts to award sole decision-making to the non-abusive parent—at least for a period of time—so that medical, educational, and counseling decisions can be made without intimidation or obstruction. Parenting time is then tailored to the level of risk. Judges may order supervised visitation at a center or with a trained supervisor, require safe-location exchanges, start with short daytime visits before considering any overnights, or, in severe cases, temporarily prohibit contact. As experienced family lawyer Inesa Paulikas points out, “parenting time can be restricted if it is shown that one or both parents have engaged in harmful conduct, such as domestic violence.”