Top Insights And Reflections From The Panel
The panel discussion highlighted several key insights and takeaways, offering a comprehensive look at the LLP program’s development, impact, and future in Colorado.
1. A Calling to Serve
Each panelist shared a deep-rooted desire to help families through legal challenges. Whether it was years of paralegal experience, a background in child advocacy, or a desire to practice law without the full burden of law school, all three LLPs saw the program as a unique and meaningful path to deliver justice to those who need it most.
2. Facing Misconceptions Head-On
From being dismissed as “just a paralegal” to encountering confusion from judges and clients alike, LLPs continue to battle misunderstandings about their role. Yet, each panelist emphasized the importance of clear communication, client education, and professionalism in overcoming skepticism and earning trust.
3. Confidence is Key
Skepticism can be contagious—but so can confidence. The LLPs agreed that staying grounded in their training, experience, and the significance of their licensure helps them push past doubt and prove their value daily.
4. Clarifying Scope and Setting Expectations
Panelists emphasized the need to explain their scope of practice early and often. From engagement agreements to pre-hearing reminders, setting boundaries helps manage expectations and strengthens trust.
5. Support Systems Matter
Whether it’s firm attorneys backing them up or the wider LLP community on LinkedIn and at events, the importance of mentorship and mutual support came through loud and clear.
6. Ongoing Education is a Must
CLEs, weekly case law reading, and personal study guides were just a few ways LLPs keep their legal knowledge sharp. Staying informed isn’t optional—it’s essential.
7. The Road Ahead: Scope, Expansion, and Advocacy
Looking to the future, panelists hope for clearer rules, expanded scopes—especially around witness examination—and potential involvement in underserved areas like dependency and neglect cases. They called for continued judicial support and public education to reinforce the program’s legitimacy.